Skip Navigation

Capital Markets Law Journal 2008 3(2):107-108; doi:10.1093/cmlj/kmn006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

CMLJ Express

A rapid-read overview of the main items in this issue

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.


   A transactional approach to the Hague Securities Convention (see p. 109)
 
Carl S. Bjerre and Sandra M. Rocks

Transactions involving intermediated securities—i.e. securities that are held in an account with a broker, bank, clearing agency or other intermediary—demand a high degree of ex ante legal certainty. However, for intermediated securities accounts and transactions that reach across borders as is increasingly prevalent, the traditional conflicts of law rules for many of the most important commercial law issues fail to provide this certainty. The Hague Securities Convention provides a modern and practical approach for determining the applicable law. . . . [Full Text of this Article]


   Lessons from Cukurova (see p. 126)
 

   Disclosure in the EEA securities markets—making sense of the puzzle (see p. 139)
 

   Economic crises, capital transfer restrictions and investor protection under modern investment treaties (see p. 154)
 

   The implementation of the EU Transparency Obligations Directive—a country-by-country analysis (see p. 186)
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?