Skip Navigation

Capital Markets Law Journal 2009 4(1):3-5; doi:10.1093/cmlj/kmn036
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

CMLJ Express

A rapid-read overview of the main items in this issue

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.


   The attack on national regulation: why we need a global framework for domestic regulation (see p. 6)
 
Edward F. Greene and Omer S. Oztan

In regulating cross-border capital markets transactions, regulators are employing either an exemptive approach, or a unilateral or mutual recognition approach. In regulating cross-border transactions, the SEC has traditionally relied on the exemptive approach, and has restricted participation to only the largest, most sophisticated US investors. Recently, it has moved to a mutual recognition approach with its agreement with Australia, which allows a broader range of US investors to conduct cross-border transactions with Australian exchanges and broker-dealers relying almost entirely on the adequacy of the Australian regulatory system. However, both its exemptive approach and mutual recognition approach deal only with secondary market transactions, not participation in offerings.

While the SEC's proposed amendments to Rule 15a-6, together with its mutual . . . [Full Text of this Article]


   The European Union—law, financial institutions and the banking crisis (see p. 32)
 

   Is it time to highlight the limits of risk-based financial regulation? (see p. 50)
 

   Hedge fund regulation, market discipline and the Hedge Fund Working Group (see p. 63)
 

   Innovation after the revolution: foreign sovereign bond contracts since 2003 (see p. 85)
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?